Thursday, December 13, 2018

Effective Ways of Planning Lessons


Teaching is sharing of experiences that help in better and easy learning. It is not difficult to make someone understand and remember the text for some time, but it needs rigorous practice of planning to enable the learner understand the text for a life time. Here comes the role of planning a lesson.

What is required to plan a lesson? A book? No. It needs understanding of what the National Curriculum Framework is expecting us teachers to do in the classroom. Most of the teachers, and for that matter, the Principal of the school, too isn’t aware of the teaching and learning objectives given in the National Curriculum Framework. Every Textbook that NCRT provides has guidelines at the start of the unit that help the teacher in understanding the objectives laid by the National Curriculum Framework. But do teachers even care to read those guidelines?
Why are these guidelines important?
Sometimes, a teacher may know about the topic more than required for his teaching. Sometimes teachers are not aware of different definitions given by the Education Committee for the same concept. These guidelines help in limiting and delimiting teachers’ teaching and thus help the teacher to focus on particular aspects. It is not that teachers cannot go beyond the given guidelines, but during teaching, these guidelines work as a trail on which a teacher has to walk and come back.
Once the guidelines are studied, a teacher understands the objectives of his teaching. A teacher always divides his objectives on the basis of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The objectives should be divided into remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating. Though these are the main objectives for achieving any teaching goal, these objectives further can be divided into smaller goals and larger goals too. Thus, in a lesson plan, then has to be minimum six objectives.
Once the objectives are derived, a teacher then needs to find out the skills and the knowledge aspects that he would like his students to be acquainted with or possess. It is called as ‘Learning Outcomes’. Learning Outcomes always starts with the phrase ‘At the end of this chapter/unit, the student will be able to …’. Thus learning outcomes is the direct result of the proposed achievements that are planned in the previous stage i.e. writing Teaching objectives.
Now your teaching objectives and learning outcomes are decided, you cannot go to teach in the class. A teacher has to create a plan to evaluate students’ achievement. This is called as planning ‘Formative’ and ‘Summative’ assessment. Formative and summative assessments should be planned keeping in mind the learning outcomes.
Why to plan assessments even before we teach?
It has been a common trend in India and most of the countries in Asia to make question papers to check students’ memorization skills. But memory is not the only skill a teacher wants students to develop. That is why while planning the assessment, one should be really aware of the LEARNING OUTCOMES. Because learning outcomes act as a lighthouse for assessment planning. Our assessment should only assess the skills we are trying to imbibe in the students. Anything other than that would only give a wrong analysis of the students’ performance.
Once the foundation is made (teaching objectives, learning outcomes and Assessments), the actual planning of ‘what to do when we enter the class’ starts.
A great teacher always creates curiosity amongst the students before teaching the topic. Curiosity will lead to making students inquire more, want more, and thus, get more.
How to build the curiosity?
The best way is to tell students stories, share with them the case studies, share with them your experiences related to the topic, asking them questions to make them ask more questions. These all activities come under non-instructional teaching practices, and they are equally important as teaching practices. Imagine telling the story of the need of survey in Delhi for the sudden increase of number of women during last decade. Students will come up with various questions and answers for the same, and it will give teacher an opportunity to tell them what statistics is, and why it is required. A good amount of time should be given for ice-breaking. I always prefer to have an Inquiry Wall in the classroom where students will post their questions regarding the topic to be learnt.
Gone is the era when teacher used to teach with lecture, chalk and board. Though we are 21st century teachers, we have to outlive our own era, we have to try to be the teacher of 22nd century. Keeping in mind different types of learners, we have to plan different types of teaching methodology. Some of the best methods to teach students are story-telling, narrating, giving case study, but in each case, students have to proactively involve. A good teacher always has a bundle of different activities prepared in advance to take in the classroom. These activities not only help in engaging the class, but also in going closer to the learning outcomes.
Each day’s teaching is to be assessed. Each day a teacher should check whether he/she is teaching properly and the students are showing the signs of achieving learning outcomes. If not done on a regular basis, teacher may not realize whether students’ are prepared for learning the next part of the text. This stage will also help in understanding the low performers and planning remedial for them.
After learning the concept, a teacher has to plan what student will explore. A teacher has to show what activity students will complete to help them explore the material. Activities such as stations, cooperative learning groups, games, worksheet or other instructional methods, help in the same.
Once the explanation, teaching is done, elaborating starts. Elaborating, in education, is independent practice. Students should be given many activities where they will get opportunities to apply the knowledge and the skills they achieved during the teaching-learning process. These activities should help the children apply the learning in variety of situations. This work has to be done in the classroom and also at home.
Evaluation is the end stage in most of the lesson plans. But according to me, it has to be a stage at the each stage of learning. We have to evaluate students’ prior knowledge, their learning abilities, their skills, etc. Thus evaluation is not something to be taken only at the end. But yes, formative and summative assessment will help in evaluating students’ understanding of the concept and thus, in making a new plan to achieve the teaching objectives. Daily evaluation should be done in the form of an EXIT SLIP where a teacher will make a chit with a question written on it, and the students have to answer it in the end of the session.  
Being a teacher is easy, making people call you a great teacher is challenging. Only great planning will ease the journey from ‘A Teacher’ to an ‘Awesome Teacher’.  

















Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Vedic Education Vs Modern Macaulay's Education




Decisions go wrong, and there is nothing wrong about it.

When one way doesn’t work for us, we change it to other. We choose the other way. But eventually when we find that the other way too is not much effective, we get frustrated, and instead of finding out which way was better, we curse the Way 2 and feel that Way 1 was better. Things are happening the same way in education, especially when people praise ‘Vedic Education System’ and curse ‘The New Education System’ brought by Lord Macaulay.

Both have their pros and cons, and for that matter, every education system has. Education system cannot be changed from A to B. It has to evolve from A to better A to Best A. But if asked which one is better in the cases of Vedic Education and the new Macaulay education, we should look for the one which has lesser cons.

Image result for vedic education systemVedic Education system was hidden, or let’s say, was forgotten by the people of India till the rise of the new Hindutva or the right winged extremism. Why suddenly people started finding a better alternative in Education in the form of Vedic System? It has something to do with present Socio-Political situations. According to m, Vedic Education has the cons that would stop a generations growth.

1)    Vedic Education system emphasized upon ‘learning by heart’ and not by finding the universal reasoning for anything. Students, studying in Ashramas, were taught about the Vedas without questioning them. This is SANATAN way of education. The word SANATAN stands for things that has no birth and are prevailed in the society since ages. Better way to understand is, SANATAN means something given by GOD and not to be challenge. For me, the real education starts in challenging the wrongs and finding what the truth is. For example: There are many pundits who teach their current generation about Pooja Path, about how to take Satya Narayan Puja and all. They teach them about the rituals and the methods. But the student is not supposed to ask any question that will put the teacher in dilemma. The student is not supposed to ask any question that arouses his rational thinking, universal reasoning.

2)    Vedic Education was confined only for a particular stratum of the society. For example: In Vedic Era, only Brahmins were allowed to teach only to Brahmins. So who will be educated? Only Brahmins. What about other strata of the society? Shudras were not the part of this education system. So, it would be very right to say, that Vedic Education System did not believe in inclusiveness. Not everybody was included in the system. On the other hand, those who wanted to be a part of system, were sidelined by cruel intentions. For example: How Eklavya was thrown out of the competition by the Guru Drona. On the other hand, Macaulay’s education system brought all the members of the society together in the mainstream education, proposed special facilities for those who couldn’t afford it.

3)    The entire concept of Vedas is put into the culture for making mental slaves. Manusmirti was also written in the times of Vedas, and can be called as one of the Vedic Literature. But, it criticizes women calling women good for nothing but for taking care of the families. There are many objectionable things written about women and untouchables in Manusmriti. How can we say that such Vedic Literature is to be accepted in today’s era? Manusmiriti classified people and pave the road of RACISM and CASTISM in Indian Soil. Now people who defend Vedas will says that Varna System was for division of labour, but my question will be if it was for division of labour, why there is no history or literature that talked about a Shudra becoming a Brahmin. So, it is very much clear that Vedas talk not about division of labour, but division of laborers.  

4)    Lack of rational thinking, lack of inquisitiveness is also one of the characteristics of Vedic Education.

5)    It is said that Vedic Education System talked about Wisdom. But to reach wisdom, one has to go through following steps:
Data – Information – Knowledge - Wisdom
But when the very first step of Knowledge relies much on some supernatural element, or on some element whose existence has not been proved yet, and will not be proved, the last step of wisdom becomes mere a dream.  

5) Vedic Education system was closed. Completely closed. Data limited. Authenticity of the data was not verified. Conclusions were not checked and verified under different variables. May be that's why there wasn't any Issac Newton produced by Vedic Education. 

When we have so many flows, which if accepted in today's generation would create a wide disparity amongst social classes and would create 'by heart learners', calling Vedic Education System as an alternative to Macaulay's Education System wouldn't be a nice idea. 

I know Macaulay's education system too wasn't good as it, according to most of us, created clerks. But still Macaulay's education system believes in equality, liberty and the most important, in rationality. We cannot finalize an education system, it has to evolve with evolving times. 



Thursday, March 8, 2018

A SAMPLE ENGLISH PAPER FOR BOARDS EXAM

Section A: Reading
Q.1. Read the extract given below and answer the questions:
On February 17, 1920, a group of Indian revolutionaries met in Kabul to pass a resolution. The resolution directed at the Russian Communist revolutionary, Vladimir Lenin, expressed deep admiration of Soviet Russia’s working class struggle that was led by him. “The Indian revolutionaries express their deep gratitude and their admiration of the great struggle carried on by soviet Russia for the liberation of all oppressed classes and peoples, and especially for the liberation of India,” said the statement. Just about a couple of months later, Lenin responded to the Indian call, “I am glad to hear that the principles of self-determination and the liberation of oppressed nations from exploitation by foreign and native capitalism, proclaimed by the Workers’ and Peasants’ Republic, have met with such a ready response among progressive Indians, who are waging a heroic fight for freedom,” said he. For the revolutionary leader, an Indian free from an oppressive British rule was a necessary prerequisite for a decisive defeat of an exploitative capitalist system.
Lenin was sure that the Russian revolution would be incomplete unless it was followed by a similar uprising of workers and peasants across Europe and Asia. The anti-colonial struggle in this regard was a necessity, an essential step in that direction, and Lenin did everything in his capacity to motivate and support a revolution against imperialist rules.
On Tuesday, the legacy of the Soviet leader in Indian received a disturbing jolt when a statue of his in Belonia town of Tripura was brought down by an enthusiastic crowd of BJP supporters amid cries of “Bharat Mata ki Jai.” The demolition was on one had justified by the BJP as a reaction by those being ‘oppressed’ by the Left. On the other hand, the CPI-M explained the act as the manifestation of ‘Communism Phobia’. “Even if it was a statue of former CPI(M) chief minister Nripen Chakraborthy, nobody would have touched it – he was one of us and belonged to the country. But what does this foreigner Lenin have to do with our people?” remarked BJP south district secretary Raju Nath in response to the incident.
Questions:
1.      What was the intention of Indian revolutionaries for passing the revolution in Kabul? (2 Marks)
2.      How did Lenin praise the Indian spirit of fight against oppressions? (2 Marks)
3.      Why did Lenin want India free from oppressive colonist rule? (2 Marks)
4.      How did BJP justify the demolishing of Lenin’s statue? (2 Marks)
5.      Find the words from the passage which mean:
a.       Freedom (para 1)
b.      Utilization in the form of mistreat (Para 1)
c.       Mutiny (Para 2)
d.      Pulling down (Para 3)
Q.2. Read the extract given below and answer the questions:
There is a minor celebrity hood that comes with occasionally appearing on Arnab's show. In the oddest of places, strangers will walk up to me and ask, 'Don't I Know you from somewhere? ' There was a time when I would seriously consider the possibility, but I've come to realise that many people are really at home only in front of their TV watching Arnab, and in that sense I am an old acquaintance.
I had little inkling of this fate when I first started appearing on television to defend Open magazine's decision to publish the Radia tapes After that memorable television encounter where Barkha Dutt and Manu Joseph replayed the same conversation 20 times over, I was left to fend for the magazine on other channels. Initially, I agreed to continue appearing on Arnab's channel because the magazine's publisher insisted this was good publicity; it was only later that I saw some journalistic sense in doing so.
I say this despite harbouring no illusions about the nature of the show. It is a performance with Arnab as the director and the main character, and an audience swept along by the drama of what transpires. The form is defined by Arnab, the substance born out of the audience. This is an audience that comprises the section of middle class which is comfortable watching news on television in English. It is socially liberal, hence the anger against gharwapasi or those opposing Valentine's Day, but it is xenophobic in its nationalism, hence the noise about Pakistan or Greenpeace. If NDTV was the product of the scions of a particular elite telling the rest of the English- speaking class what to think, Times Now gives voice to what this class actually thinks, which is why this Prime Time clash was never much of contest.
In this theatre, journalists like me have a prescribed role: to endorse Arnab's opinion. Journalists perceived to be affiliated with a political party can't carry this off with any conviction. Those who remain are likely to endorse Arnab only when they genuinely agree with him, forcing the channel to cherry pick. I know I won't be asked to appear on a show about offloading a Greenpeace activist, because I'd then be at odds with Arnab.
What does this role offer those who accept it? The increased visibility lends their work greater value at a time personal branding is increasingly defining value in journalism. But I also see it as an opportunity to point out to a largely apathetic country that in 1984, Kamal Nath was at the head of a mob that burned two Sikhs to death a few 100 metres from Parliament. Or voice my apprehensions about Narendra Modi to a mass audience at a time the country seemed besotted with him. This is possible because Arnab's sole interest is his play, he is not a participant in the games most other anchors play out in Delhi. Interestingly, the roles come with no strings attached. No one's ever asked me not to be critical of Arnab, as I have been, or Samir Jain, as I continue to be.
Questions:
1)      What did the writer realize about the TV watching habit of his countrymen? (1 Mark)
2)      Why did the writer continue appearing on Arnab's Channel? (1 Mark)
3)      Which section of society watches Arnab's show ? (1 Mark)
4)      Who is 'xenophobic' in its nationalism ? (1 Mark)
5)      Why do people appear on Arnab's show? (1 Mark)
6)      On which news channel does Arnab appear? (1 Mark)
7)      Find words from the passage which mean the same as: (2 Mark)
a)      An erroneous mental representation. (b) A descendant or heir

Section B: Writing and Grammar

Q.3. You are Suman/Sumit Shinde from M.G. Road, Nagpur. Write a letter to the editor of a local daily mentioning your concern over improper implementation of inclusive education and RTE in the schools in your locality. (8 Marks)

Q.4. Write a story on the basis of following points: (12 Marks)

Three friends – decide to play a prank on fourth friend – midnight – ghost prank – fourth friend disappears – nowhere to be seen – three friends see a ghost – get scared and run away – fourth friend is the ghost – prank failed

Q.5. Rearrange the following jumbled words to make meaningful sentences: (3 Marks)

free/ is /not born / a man / a slave /but / a / to be /soul/to be
Ans: A man is not born to be a slave but to be a free soul.

ruling /always /sure /amongst / the /make /of /classes /commoners /illiteracy.
rebels /person /slavery /the /of /the /against /ruling /classes /aware.
is /a /day /to /live /it /like /a /hundred /tiger /for /than /a /better /goat /for /days.

Q.6. Read the given conversation and complete the following sentences: (4 Marks)

Ajay: Are we not going for a movie?
Kavita: Why should I go with you?
Ajay: I know you are angry at me since last night.
Kavita: I am not coming with you. Take someone else for a movie.
Ajay: You started the fight first last night.
Kavita: But why did you comment on my family?

Ajay asked Kavita (a) ………………………………… She replied saying (b) ……………………… To that Ajay said that he knew that she was angry at him since the previous night. To that Kavita told him that she was not coming with him and also told him (c) ……………………. Ajay mentioned that it was Kavita who had started the fight first the previous night. To that Kavita questions Ajay (d) ……………………..

Q.7. Read the given paragraph. In each line (except the second line) there is word missing. Find the missing word and write it as it is given in sample answer: (3 Marks)
Word Before
Missing word
Word after
Days after India reached out  China and
out
to
China
advised Indian officials skip events organised
by the Tibetan government-in-exile, Beijing 
a)  …………….
 …………….
 …………….
Thursday  New Delhi to shed “mental inhibitions”
b)  …………….
 …………….
 …………….
“mutual suspicion” to improve bilateral ties.
c)  …………….
 …………….
 …………….
Using one of the most oft-repeated metaphors 
d) …………….
 …………….
 …………….
India and China, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi
said it  time for the Chinese dragon and Indian
e) …………….
 …………….
 …………….
elephant to dance together rather  fight each other.
f) …………….
 …………….
 …………….

Section C: Literature
Q.8. Read the following extract and answer the questions given below:  (4 Marks)
“My credit now stands on such slippery grounds”.
a)      Who said this and to whom?
b)      Why does the speaker say so?
c)      What does the phrase ‘such slippery ground’ refer to here?
d)      Is the speaker honest to say so? Why do you think so?

OR
Q.8. Read the following extract and answer the questions given below:  (4 Marks)
“But you shall shine more bright in these contents
Than unswept stone, besmear'd with sluttish time.”

a)      Identify and explain the figures of speech given in these lines.
b)      Why does the poet call the time ‘sluttish’?
c)      What is the main theme of this poem?
d)      What do you mean by the lines ‘unswept stones besmeared with sluttish time’?

Q.9. Answer any four of the following questions in 50 to 60 words: (2 x 4 = 8 Marks)

a)      ‘Mrs. Packetide’s Tiger’ is an environmental satire. Explain.
b)      The law of Karma is one of the major themes of Dhumketu’s ‘The Letter’. Discuss.
c)      How does John Hallock’s promise to Helen fail miserably?
d)      Patol Babu doesn’t wait to take money after his shoot get over. Why?
e)      Discuss the themes common between ‘The Rime of Ancient Mariner’ and ‘Snake’.
f)       How has the poet described the snake?

Q.10. ‘The Dear Departed’ is the writer’s take on modern isolated families and that is what makes it a and ironical social satire. Explain with reference to the play.            (8 Marks)

Q.11. How the personality of young Anne keeps on changing due to the various incidence that happened in her family and society around her.  (10 Marks)



RETHINKING THE PURPOSE OF HOMEWORK

In education in India, homework has long been viewed as a staple, a marker of a student's engagement with academic material. Yet, the qu...